France - LFB (W)
Standings
France - LFB (W) basketball (LFB)
Standings for 2009-2010 season
Rk | Team | % Victory | Gp | Gw | GL | Pts+ | Pts- | Pts+ /g | Pts- /g | Diff | Expected Winning % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Tarbes | 88.5 | 26 | 23 | 3 | 2030 | 1716 | 78.1 | 66.0 | 12.1 | 91.2 |
2 | Bourges | 84.6 | 26 | 22 | 4 | 1726 | 1411 | 66.4 | 54.3 | 12.1 | 94.3 |
3 | Arras | 76.9 | 26 | 20 | 6 | 1953 | 1755 | 75.1 | 67.5 | 7.6 | 81.6 |
4 | Mondeville | 69.2 | 26 | 18 | 8 | 1908 | 1755 | 73.4 | 67.5 | 5.9 | 76.2 |
5 | Nantes | 65.4 | 26 | 17 | 9 | 1853 | 1731 | 71.3 | 66.6 | 4.7 | 72.1 |
6 | Villeneuve d'Ascq | 61.5 | 26 | 16 | 10 | 1994 | 1794 | 76.7 | 69.0 | 7.7 | 81.3 |
7 | Lattes Montpellier | 61.5 | 26 | 16 | 10 | 1765 | 1657 | 67.9 | 63.7 | 4.2 | 70.6 |
8 | Challes-les-Eaux | 38.5 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 1767 | 1789 | 68.0 | 68.8 | -0.8 | 45.7 |
9 | Basket Landes | 38.5 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 1680 | 1762 | 64.6 | 67.8 | -3.2 | 34.0 |
10 | Calais | 34.6 | 26 | 9 | 17 | 1747 | 1823 | 67.2 | 70.1 | -2.9 | 35.6 |
11 | Aix-en-Provence | 30.8 | 26 | 8 | 18 | 1727 | 1885 | 66.4 | 72.5 | -6.1 | 22.8 |
12 | Toulouse | 26.9 | 26 | 7 | 19 | 1696 | 1880 | 65.2 | 72.3 | -7.1 | 19.3 |
13 | Armentières | 23.1 | 26 | 6 | 20 | 1479 | 1788 | 56.9 | 68.8 | -11.9 | 6.7 |
14 | Limoges | 0.0 | 26 | 0 | 26 | 1501 | 2080 | 57.7 | 80.0 | -22.3 | 1.1 |
Standings glossary
Stats abbreviations
- Rk: rank
- % Victory: number of win / number of games played
- Gp: number of games played
- Gw: number of games won
- GL: number of games lost
- Pts+: total number of points scored by the team
- Pts-: total number of points scored by opposing teams
- Pts+ /g: total number of points scored by the team per game
- Pts- /g: total number of points scored by opposing teams per game
- Diff: difference between points scored and received per game
- Expected Winning %: through our basketball statistical database and the use of advanced stats, we are able to project a team’s win percentage which then allows us to project how many wins a team is expected to have. These projections are a unique way to understand whether a team has played better or worse than their record indicates.