Slovenia - 2. SKL
Standings
Slovenia - 2. SKL basketball (SLO-2)
Standings for 2007-2008 season
Rk | Team | % Victory | Gp | Gw | GL | Pts+ | Pts- | Pts+ /g | Pts- /g | Diff | Expected Winning % |
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
1 | Postojna | 88.5 | 26 | 23 | 3 | 2199 | 1834 | 84.6 | 70.5 | 14.1 | 92.6 |
2 | Parklji | 84.6 | 26 | 22 | 4 | 2151 | 1823 | 82.7 | 70.1 | 12.6 | 90.9 |
3 | Gorica | 80.8 | 26 | 21 | 5 | 2088 | 1857 | 80.3 | 71.4 | 8.9 | 83.6 |
4 | Hrastnik | 73.1 | 26 | 19 | 7 | 2111 | 2050 | 81.2 | 78.8 | 2.4 | 60.1 |
5 | Gradisce | 53.9 | 26 | 14 | 12 | 1968 | 1948 | 75.7 | 74.9 | 0.8 | 53.5 |
6 | Jance | 50.0 | 26 | 13 | 13 | 1970 | 1955 | 75.8 | 75.2 | 0.6 | 52.7 |
7 | Zasavje PRO-TEK | 46.2 | 26 | 12 | 14 | 2053 | 2031 | 79.0 | 78.1 | 0.9 | 53.7 |
8 | Rogaska Crystal | 42.3 | 26 | 11 | 15 | 1996 | 1991 | 76.8 | 76.6 | 0.2 | 50.9 |
9 | Litija | 38.5 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 1977 | 2041 | 76.0 | 78.5 | -2.5 | 39.1 |
10 | Konjice | 38.5 | 26 | 10 | 16 | 2031 | 2202 | 78.1 | 84.7 | -6.6 | 24.5 |
11 | Radenska | 34.6 | 26 | 9 | 17 | 1848 | 2029 | 71.1 | 78.0 | -6.9 | 21.4 |
12 | ECE Triglav Kranj | 26.9 | 26 | 7 | 19 | 1818 | 1993 | 69.9 | 76.7 | -6.8 | 21.8 |
13 | Celje | 26.9 | 26 | 7 | 19 | 1850 | 2029 | 71.2 | 78.0 | -6.8 | 21.7 |
14 | Brinox Medvode | 15.4 | 26 | 4 | 22 | 1905 | 2182 | 73.3 | 83.9 | -10.6 | 13.1 |
Standings glossary
Stats abbreviations
- Rk: rank
- % Victory: number of win / number of games played
- Gp: number of games played
- Gw: number of games won
- GL: number of games lost
- Pts+: total number of points scored by the team
- Pts-: total number of points scored by opposing teams
- Pts+ /g: total number of points scored by the team per game
- Pts- /g: total number of points scored by opposing teams per game
- Diff: difference between points scored and received per game
- Expected Winning %: through our basketball statistical database and the use of advanced stats, we are able to project a team’s win percentage which then allows us to project how many wins a team is expected to have. These projections are a unique way to understand whether a team has played better or worse than their record indicates.